If Chuck Norris were to travel to an alternate dimension in which there was another Chuck Norris and they both fought, they would both win.
This page supports your learning in Module 2, where we examine how time, narrative and experimentation challenge traditional storytelling in media art.
This Writing Practice will help you prepare for both:
Short answer responses (1.5 pages hand-written, ~30 mins) and
Extended responses (3–4 pages hand-written, ~60 mins)
(Approx. 1.5 pages handwritten – 25–30 mins)
These questions require precision, terminology and close reference to specific scenes. There are some tips, but they are not exhaustive by any means.
What this is really testing:
Media languages — narrative structure and editing
Audience positionin
System of communication
High-quality answer should include:
Knowledge
Define narrative manipulation (parallel timelines, iterative loops)
Identify specific structural features (repetition, split screen, montage)
Understanding
Explain how the structure positions the audience to compare alternatives
Differentiate Run Lola Run from single-timeline storytelling
Application
Refer to key sequences:
Lola’s three repeated runs
Differences between versions (interactions, minor changes)
The role of timing/clock motif
Analysis
Show how repetition encourages active comparison
Connect the narrative pattern to theme (chance, consequence)
Evaluation
Discuss whether the structure increases engagement or destabilises certainty
What this is really testing:
Media languages
Narrative form and audience reconstruction
Comparative analysis
High-quality answer should include:
Knowledge
Define reverse chronology vs parallel timelines
Identify editing devices used in each
Understanding
Explain how each structure affects perception of cause/effect
Application
Specific evidence:
Reverse colour sequences in Memento
Three run iterations in Run Lola Run
Analysis
Examine how each film forces the audience to piece meaning together
Evaluation
Judge which structure more radically challenges traditional narrative expectation
What this is really testing:
Media languages — sound
System of communication
Audience positioning
High-quality answer should include:
Knowledge
Identify techno score in Run Lola Run
Identify musical pacing in True
Understanding
Explain how music drives tempo and editing rhythm
Application
Specific sequences where music dictates pacing (e.g., Lola’s runs, key relational beats in True)
Analysis
Link how music amplifies urgency, emotional engagement
Evaluation
Compare effectiveness across both works
What this is really testing:
Narrative structure
Media languages
Audience role
High-quality answer should include:
Knowledge
Define temporal compression (events condensed into heightened emotional time)
Understanding
Explain how this affects audience’s understanding of character
Application
Specific moments in True where time feels elastic
Analysis
Link compressed time to emotional impact
What this is really testing:
Evolution of narrative forms
Audience positioning
Historical context
High-quality answer should include:
Knowledge
Characteristics of classical Hollywood narrative (causality, resolution)
Contrasts with postmodern narrative play
Understanding
Explain how audience role shifts from passive to active interpreter
Application
Refer to:
Retrospective confession in Double Indemnity
Iterative timelines in Run Lola Run
Analysis
Show how uncertainty becomes part of meaning
Evaluation
Judge whether this evolution strengthens audience engagement
(Approx. 3–4 pages handwritten – 50–60 mins)
These questions require synthesis across texts and deeper argumentation. There are some tips, but they are not exhaustive by any means.
High-quality response structure:
Knowledge
Define narrative structure
Identify structural techniques in Memento and Run Lola Run
Understanding
Explain how structure is not just form, but them
Application
Evidence from both films
Analysis
How structure alters audience meaning construction
Evaluation
Judge the claim — does structure become theme?
Synthesis
Connect to broader movements (experimental → contemporary)
High-quality response should include:
Knowledge
Define causality in classical storytelling
Describe structural experiments in both films
Understanding
Explain why each director chooses their approach
Application
Close reference to sequences
Analysis
Compare the different effects on audiences
Evaluation
Judge which more radically subverts causality
Synthesis
Link to Expressionist legacy
High-quality response should include:
Knowledge
Identify sound and editing devices
Define narrative rhythm
Understanding
Explain how sound and editing interlock
Application
Specific scenes and beats
Analysis
How rhythm influences interpretation
Evaluation
Comparative strength of approaches
Synthesis
Link rhythm to emotional and thematic meaning
High-quality response should include:
Knowledge
Define chance vs fate
Understanding
Explain narrative mechanisms that foreground chance
Application
Evidence from three iterations of Lola’s runs
Analysis
How small changes reshape outcomes
Evaluation
Judge whether chance becomes more significant than character intent
Synthesis
Relate to postmodern narrative philosophy
High-quality response should include:
Knowledge
Definitions of audience expectation
Understanding
Explain how narrative experiments demand new engagement
Application
Refer to at least three films from Modules 1–2
Analysis
How each structure guides audience reconstruction
Evaluation
Judge whether this redefinition is beneficial or alienating
Synthesis
Connect to genre evolution (Noir → Neo-Noir → Postmodern)
Across all extended responses, high-quality work should:
Establish conceptual clarity
Define key terms clearly and early
Demonstrate close textual analysis
Reference specific scenes
Avoid plot summary
Integrate context meaningfully
Historical, industrial and stylistic context strengthens argument
Compare, not just describe
Identify patterns and evolution across films
Make evaluative judgments
Use evaluative language such as:
“Arguably…”
“More significantly…”
“While it may appear…, it ultimately…”